Review Article
Exercise and other nonpharmacological strategies to reduce blood pressure in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Previous Presentations: Presented at the UK Public Health Science 2017 conference, London, UK November 2017 and published in abstract form.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jash.2018.01.008Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The incidence of hypertension increases with advancing age and represents a significant burden of disease.

  • Lifestyle interventions for reducing blood pressure in the elderly have not previously been reviewed systematically.

  • Three months of exercise-based lifestyle intervention may produce a reduction in blood pressure of approximately 5 mmHg systolic and 3 mmHg diastolic in older individuals.

Abstract

The incidence of hypertension increases with advancing age and represents a significant burden of disease. Lifestyle modification represents the first-line intervention in treatment algorithms; however, the majority of evidence for this comes from studies involving young participants using interventions that may not always be feasible in the elderly. This manuscript presents a systematic review of all randomized controlled trials involving participants with a mean age of 65 or over investigating nonpharmacological strategies to reduce blood pressure (BP). Fifty-three randomized controlled trials were included. The majority of interventions described aerobic exercise training, dynamic resistance exercise training, or combined aerobic and dynamic resistance exercise training (COM), with limited studies reporting isometric exercise training or alternative lifestyle strategies. Aerobic exercise training, dynamic resistance exercise training, COM, and isometric exercise training all elicited significant reductions in both systolic and diastolic BP, with no additional benefit of COM compared with single modality exercise training. Three months of traditional exercise-based lifestyle intervention may produce a reduction in BP of approximately 5 mmHg systolic and 3 mmHg diastolic in older individuals, similar to that expected in younger individuals.

Introduction

In the UK, the prevalence of hypertension is estimated at 31% for men and 28% for women; unchanged for a decade.1 Hypertension increases the risk of cardiovascular events, and this risk is lowered by reducing blood pressure (BP). A meta-analysis involving 464,000 patients showed that both ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular events can be significantly reduced by a 10 mmHg reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) or 5 mmHg reduction in diastolic blood pressure (DBP).2 Treating hypertension is expensive but is offset by reduction in the need for care following cardio-cerebro-vascular events. Reducing the BP of the population in general may save up to £850 million over 10 years.3, 4, 5

Hypertension is managed pharmacologically for the most part.6, 7, 8 Antihypertensives can be effective in lowering BP,9 but compliance remains an issue as many patients dislike taking medication for asymptomatic disease or experience problematic side effects.10, 11

Lifestyle modification is often the first line in management in treatment guidelines.6, 7, 12, 13 Although they are financially attractive14 and effective within studies,15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 lifestyle interventions, including sodium intake reduction and various forms of exercise training may suffer from poor compliance outside the setting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).28

There is a well-described association between advancing age and hypertension, with prevalence increasing from 8% in men and 2% in women in the age range of 16–24 years to 66% in men and 78% in women aged 75 years and above.1 However, the majority of studies evaluating lifestyle and exercise interventions have been carried out in younger adults and not the elderly. Clinical guidelines and evidence in older adults are lacking, with a recent systematic review of cardiovascular disease prevention concluding that guidelines are often vague in their coverage of older people and often based on limited evidence.29 No review to date has evaluated the evidence from lifestyle modification RCTs involving participants with a mean age of 65 years or above (the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development's definition of elderly30), where interventions suitable for younger adults may be difficult for the elderly to adhere to because of mobility impairment and other challenges.31 We aim to address this gap in evidence in this review and meta-analysis.

Section snippets

Study Design

This systematic review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (registration number CRD42017059443) and was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA statement.32 Only RCTs evaluating a physical activity or lifestyle modification intervention were included. Other inclusion criteria were mean participant age of 65 years or older,30 interventions lasting 2 weeks or more, and trials where resting BP was reported before and after intervention. Trials involving a drug treatment or nutraceutical

Search Results

A total of 719 abstracts were screened for inclusion, 666 from the initial literature search, 32 from the reference lists of other identified studies, and 21 from other systematic reviews. No relevant unpublished studies were identified on Clinicaltrials.gov. Of the 719 abstracts screened, 639 were excluded as not being relevant, leaving 80 studies for full-text review. Of 80 studies, 27 were excluded leaving 53 studies36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54,

Discussion

This systematic review has demonstrated that AET, RET, or both performed together (COM), undertaken regularly over at least a 3-month period can lead to reductions of 5–6 mmHg in SBP and 2–3.5 mmHg in DBP in individuals aged greater than 65 years. However, this did not reach our a priori threshold for clinical significance (10/5 mmHg).2 There was no additional benefit seen in exercise programmes lasting longer than 3 months and similar reductions in BP were seen in trials including both

Conclusions

In conclusion, the best available evidence suggests that nonpharmacological lifestyle interventions involving AET, RET, or a combination of the two can lead to statistically significant reductions in both SBP and DBP in older adults. However these reductions failed to reach thresholds for clinical significance and as such cannot be recommended as antihypertensive monotherapy, in the majority of individuals. Furthermore, the studies supporting these interventions contain various limitations.

Acknowledgments

P.H. is supported by a research training fellowship jointly awarded by the Royal College of Surgeons of England and the Dunhill Medical Trust. The authors would like to thank the Suzanne Toft, Chartered Health Librarian at the Royal Derby Hospital for her help with the electronic database searches.

References (108)

  • M.R. Law et al.

    Use of blood pressure lowering drugs in the prevention of cardiovascular disease : meta-analysis of 147 randomised epidemiological studies

    Br Med J

    (2009)
  • NHS England

    Prescription cost analysis

  • A.E. Moran et al.

    Cost-Effectiveness of hypertension therapy according to 2014 guidelines

    N Engl J Med

    (2015)
  • Public Health England

    New figures show high blood pressure costs NHS billions each year

  • NICE

    Hypertension in adults: diagnosis and management

    NICE Guidel [CG127]

    (2011)
  • G. Mancia et al.

    2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension the Task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society

    J Hypertens

    (2013)
  • S. Ross et al.

    Antihypertensive drug prescribing in Grampian

    Br J Clin Pharmacol

    (2005)
  • J.P. Baguet et al.

    Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure

    Clin Drug Investig

    (2007)
  • D. Misselbrook et al.

    Patients’ responses to risk information about the benefits of treating hypertension

    Br J Gen Pract

    (2001)
  • S.D. Ross et al.

    Discontinuation of antihypertensive drugs due to Adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Pharmacotherapy

    (2001)
  • Nice

    Hypertension: evidence update March 2013

    Evid Updat Hypertens

    (2013)
  • M.A. Weber et al.

    Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community a Statement by the American Society of hypertension and the International Society of hypertension

    J Hypertens

    (2014)
  • A. Harada et al.

    Cost and effectiveness of exercise therapy for patients with essential hypertension

    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi

    (2001)
  • V.A. Cornelissen et al.

    Exercise training for blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    J Am Heart Assoc

    (2013)
  • V.A. Cornelissen et al.

    Effect of resistance training on resting blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

    J Hypertens

    (2005)
  • T. Semlitsch et al.

    Increasing physical activity for the treatment of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Sport Med

    (2013)
  • G. Huang et al.

    Controlled aerobic exercise training reduces resting blood pressure in sedentary older adults

    Blood Press

    (2013)
  • F.J. He et al.

    Effect of longer term modest salt reduction on blood pressure: cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

    BMJ

    (2013)
  • S. Alam et al.

    A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCT) among healthy normotensive and essential hypertensive elderly patients to determine the effect of high salt (NaCl) diet of blood pressure

    J Hum Hypertens

    (1999)
  • R.S. Taylor et al.

    Reduced dietary salt for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (Cochrane review)

    Am J Hypertens

    (2011)
  • J.A. Halbert et al.

    The effectiveness of exercise training in lowering blood pressure: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of 4 weeks or longer

    J Hum Hypertens

    (1997)
  • C.E. Rogers et al.

    A review of clinical trials of tai chi and qigong in older adults

    West J Nurs Res

    (2009)
  • M.S. Lee et al.

    Tai chi for lowering resting blood pressure in the elderly: a systematic review

    J Eval Clin Pract

    (2010)
  • M. Hamer

    Adherence to healthy lifestyle in hypertensive patients: ample room for improvement?

    J Hum Hypertens

    (2010)
  • J. Jansen et al.

    Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines recommendations about primary cardiovascular disease prevention for older adults

    BMC Fam Pract

    (2015)
  • OECD

    Elderly population

  • C. Knoepfli-Lenzin et al.

    Effects of a 12-week intervention period with football and running for habitually active men with mild hypertension

    Scand J Med Sci Sports

    (2010)
  • D. Moher et al.

    Academia and clinic Annals of Internal medicine Preferred reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement

    Ann Intern Med

    (2009)
  • M. Ouzzani et al.

    Rayyan- a web and mobile app for systematic reviews

    Syst Rev

    (2016)
  • A. Rohatgi

    WebPlotDigitizer version 3.12

  • The Cochrane Collaboration Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.2; 2008. Available at:...
  • W.B. Applegate et al.

    Nonpharmacologic intervention to reduce blood pressure in older patients with mild hypertension

    Arch Intern Med

    (1992)
  • B. Barone et al.

    Decreased exercise blood pressure in older adults after exercise training: contributions of increased fitness and decreased fatness

    Br J Sports Med

    (2009)
  • J. Blumenthal et al.

    Cardiovascular and Behavioural effects of aerobic exercise training in healthy older men and women

    J Gerontol

    (1989)
  • M. Bouchonville et al.

    Weight loss, exercise or both and cardiometabolic risk factors in obese older adults: results of a randomized controlled trial

    Int J Obes

    (2014)
  • G. Broman et al.

    High intensity deep water training can improve aerobic power in elderly women

    Eur J Appl Physiol

    (2006)
  • T. Chomiuk et al.

    The influence of systematic pulse-limited physical exercise on the parameters of the cardiovascular system in patients over 65 years of age

    Arch Med Sci

    (2013)
  • C.C. Cononie et al.

    Effect of exercise training on blood pressure in 70- to 79-yr-old men and women

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (1991)
  • F. Dimeo et al.

    Aerobic exercise reduces blood pressure in resistant hypertension

    Hypertension

    (2012)
  • J.A. Dusek et al.

    Stress management versus lifestyle modification on systolic hypertension and medication elimination: a randomized trial

    J Altern Complement Med

    (2008)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Non-pharmacological interventions for older patients with hypertension: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

      2022, Geriatric Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Non-pharmacological interventions are mainly lifestyle changes, including a low sodium diet, increased physical activity, weight reduction in obese individuals, and reduction of anxiety and fear.6 Several meta-analyses have assessed the efficacy of exercise and education for BP reduction in older adults.5,7-9 However, traditional meta-analysis can only compare the effectiveness of paired interventions.

    • Effects of an individualized and progressive multicomponent exercise program on blood pressure, cardiorespiratory fitness, and body composition in long-term care residents: Randomized controlled trial

      2022, Geriatric Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, significant differences in heart rate recovery may be observed with a higher-intensity multicomponent exercise program among LTC residents. Several studies showed that multicomponent exercise decreases blood pressure in community-dwelling older adults.53 However, we did not observe significant changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure after a multicomponent exercise program among LTC residents.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supplemental Material can be found at www.ashjournal.com.

    Conflicts of interest: None.

    1

    These authors contributed equally.

    View full text