« Previous
Next »
Journal of the American Society of Hypertension
Volume 4, Issue 5
, Pages 244-254
, September 2010
Level of blood pressure above goal and clinical inertia in a Medicaid population
References
- . High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease mortality risk among US adults: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Mortality Follow-up Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18:302–309
- Inadequate management of blood pressure in a hypertensive population. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1957–1963
- . Poor hypertension control: let’s stop blaming the patients. Cleve Clin J Med. 2002;69:793–799
- . Characteristics of patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:479–486
- . Clinical inertia. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:825–834
- . The role of clinical uncertainty in treatment decisions for diabetic patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:717–727
- . Reasons for not intensifying antihypertensive treatment (RIAT): a primary care antihypertensive intervention study. J Hypertens. 2004;22:1221–1229
- . Prevalence and predictors of white-coat response in patients with treated hypertension. CMAJ. 1999;161:265–269
- . Prevalence of white coat effect in treated hypertensive patients in the community. Am J Hypertens. 1995;8:591–597
- The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–2572
- . Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality, 2002 Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–1913
- . Effect of unrelated comorbid conditions on hypertension management. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:578–586
- . Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. BMJ. 1998;317:703–713
- . Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). JAMA. 2002;288:2981–2997
- Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1887–1898
- On-treatment diastolic blood pressure and prognosis in systolic hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1884–1891
- Effects of a fixed combination of perindopril and indapamide on macrovascular and microvascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (the ADVANCE trial): a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2007;370:829–840
- Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomized trial. Lancet. 1998;351:1755–1762
- . Effects of aggressive blood pressure control in normotensive type 2 diabetic patients on albuminuria, retinopathy and strokes. Kidney Int. 2002;61:1086–1097
- . State of disparities in cardiovascular health in the United States. Circulation. 2005;111:1233–1241
- Evaluating hypertension control in a managed care setting. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2673–2677
- National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Web site. Available at: http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/59/Default.aspx. Accessed December 7, 2009.
- The State of Health Care Quality 2009. National Committee for Quality Assurance, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.ncqa.org/Portals/0/Newsroom/SOHC/SOHC_2009.pdf. Accessed December 31, 2009.
- . Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care?. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3:209–214
- Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299:2857–2867
- Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic review. Med Care. 2006;44:646–657
Funding/support: Dr. Viera’s time to develop this article was supported by a career development award from the National Institutes of Health (KL2RR025746).
Conflict of interest: none.
PII: S1933-1711(10)00160-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2010.07.003
© 2010 American Society of Hypertension. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of the American Society of Hypertension
Volume 4, Issue 5
, Pages 244-254
, September 2010
