« Previous
Next »
Journal of the American Society of Hypertension
Volume 2, Issue 5
, Pages 378-384
, September 2008
Effects of metoprolol succinate extended release vs. amlodipine besylate on the blood pressure, heart rate, and the rate-pressure product in patients with hypertension
References
- . Usefulness of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in assessing antihypertensive therapy. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:94–98
- . Ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular risk. J Vasc Med Biol. 1994;5:61–68
- . Methods of blood pressure determination to assess antihypertensive therapy (Are casual measurements enough?). Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1989;45:581–586
- . Circadian variation and triggers of onset of acute cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 1989;79:733–743
- Morning increase in the onset of ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1989;20:473–476
- . Circadian variation of blood pressure: clinical relevance and implications for cardiovascular chronotherapeutics. Blood Press Monit. 1997;2:47–52
- . Chronotherapeutics for cardiovascular disease. Drugs. 1998;55:631–643
- . Nocturnal dosing of a novel delivery system of verapamil for systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:375–380
- . Comparison of effects of controlled onset extended release verapamil at bedtime and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system on arising on early morning blood pressure, heart rate, and the heart-rate blood pressure product. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:424–431
- . Advances in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess the effects of antihypertensive therapy. In: White WB editors. Blood pressure monitoring in cardiovascular medicine and therapeutics. 2nd edition. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press; 2007;p. 437–462
- . HR and cardiovascular risk. J Hypertens. 1997;15:3–17
- . Influence of heart rate on mortality among persons with hypertension; The Framingham Study. Am Heart J. 1993;125:1148–1154
- . Transient tachycardia: prognostic significance alone and in association with transient hypertension. JAMA. 1945;129:585–588
- . Circadian variation of hemodynamics in patients with essential hypertension: comparison between early morning and evening. J Hypertens. 1994;12:1405–1412
- . Anatomy and physiology of the circulatory system. In: Clinical cardiology. 6th edition. Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton & Lange; 1993;p. 1–38
- . Pathophysiology of silent myocardial ischemia during daily life: hemodynamic evaluation by simultaneous electrocardiographic and blood pressure monitoring. Circulation. 1990;82:1296–1304
- . Correlates of myocardial oxygen demand measured by positron emission tomography in the hypertrophied left ventricle. Am J Hypertens. 2003;16:240–243
- . Validation of the Oscar 2 oscillometric 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor according to the British Hypertension Society protocol. Blood Press Monit. 2007;12:113–117
- . Regression of left ventricular mass is accompanied by rapid left ventricular filling following antihypertensive therapy with metoprolol. Am Heart J. 1989;117:145–150
- . A comparison of the trough-to-peak ratio of cardioselective beta-blockers in patients with newly diagnosed hypertension. Blood Press Monit. 2006;11:337–342
- . Preventing increases in early-morning blood pressure, heart rate, and the rate-pressure product with controlled onset extended release verapamil at bedtime versus enalapril, losartan, and placebo on arising. Am Heart J. 2002;144:657–665
- . Blood pressure and heart rate responses during physical exercise in hypertension—modifications by drug treatment. Eur Heart J. 1999;20:B10–B17
- . Discordant beta-blocker effects on clinic, ambulatory, and exercise hemodynamics in patients with hypertension. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26:1247–1254
- . A factorial study of combination hypertension treatment with metoprolol succinate extended release and felodipine extended release. Am J Hypertens. 2006;19:388–395
This study was supported by an Independent Investigator Initiated Grant-in-Aid (IRUSMETO-0079) from Astra-Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Wilmington, Delaware, the Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Foundation, Hartford, Connecticut, and the University of Connecticut Clinical Trials Unit, Farmington, Connecticut.
Conflict of interest: none.
PII: S1933-1711(08)00035-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2008.03.002
© 2008 American Society of Hypertension. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of the American Society of Hypertension
Volume 2, Issue 5
, Pages 378-384
, September 2008
