Journal of the American Society of Hypertension
Volume 2, Issue 3 , Pages 165-172, May 2008

Reversal of vascular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients through blockade of angiotensin II receptors

  • Ronald D. Smith, MD

      Affiliations

    • Hypertension and Vascular Disease Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • Hiroshi Yokoyama, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Hypertension and Vascular Disease Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • David B. Averill, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Hypertension and Vascular Disease Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
  • ,
  • Ernesto L. Schiffrin, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • ,
  • Carlos M. Ferrario, MD

      Affiliations

    • Hypertension and Vascular Disease Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Carlos M. Ferrario, MD, Janeway Clinical Sciences Building, 5th Floor, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157. Tel: 336-716-0757; fax: 336-716-6644.

Received 29 August 2007; received in revised form 8 November 2007

Abstract 

Angiotensin II (Ang II) has been linked to vascular dysfunction and target-organ damage. Blockade of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) with an angiotensin receptor blocker may reverse vascular pathology independent of blood pressure (BP) lowering. Stage I hypertensive, nondiabetic patients (61% male; age 38 to 67 years) were randomized after a 4-week washout period to olmesartan medoxomil 20 to 40 mg or atenolol 50 to 100 mg plus additional agents (hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine, or hydralazine) as needed for a goal BP <140/90 mm Hg. At baseline and after 1 year of treatment, subcutaneous gluteal resistance arteries were examined on a pressurized myograph to evaluate remodeling. Biopsies were available from 22 atenolol recipients, 27 olmesartan medoxomil recipients, and 11 normal volunteer controls. BP was reduced to a comparable degree by olmesartan medoxomil (from 149 ± 11/92 ± 8 mm Hg to 120 ± 9/77 ± 6 mm Hg; P < .05 [mean ± standard deviation]) and atenolol (from 147 ± 10/90 ± 6 mm Hg to 125 ± 12/78 ± 7 mm Hg; P < .05 [mean ± standard deviation]) from baseline for each arm (P = .08 for the 40-week treatment mean between arms). After one year's treatment, the wall-to-lumen ratio in arteries from patients treated with olmesartan medoxomil was significantly reduced (from 14.9% to 11.1%; P < .01), whereas no significant change was observed in arteries from atenolol-treated patients (from 16.0% to 15.5%; P = NS); the wall-to-lumen ratio in controls was 11.0%. Blockade of AT1 receptors showed a superior corrective effect on the altered structure of resistance arteries in essential hypertension that was independent of the magnitude of BP reduction, and resulted in values similar to those in normotensive controls.

Keywords: Angiotensin II, atenolol, blood pressure, hypertension, olmesartan

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was supported by an unrestricted grant and study medications from Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. The authors gratefully acknowledge grant support, in part, provided by Unifi, Inc., Greensboro, NC, and the Farley-Hudson Foundation, Jacksonville, NC.

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S1933-1711(07)00243-4

doi:10.1016/j.jash.2007.11.001

Journal of the American Society of Hypertension
Volume 2, Issue 3 , Pages 165-172, May 2008