Journal of the American Society of Hypertension
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 64-69, March 2008

Association of beta-blocker use with increased aortic wave reflection

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York

Received 27 August 2007; accepted 11 October 2007.

Abstract 

Studies have found less cardiovascular risk reduction in patients treated with beta-blockers (BBs) compared with other agents. We compared the severity of aortic atherosclerosis, arterial stiffness, and wave reflection in patients treated and not treated with BBs. Seventy-two patients, 37 treated with BBs and 35 not treated, referred for transesophageal echocardiography were studied. Augmentation index (AI), heart-rate-corrected AI (AI-75), aortic systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure, pulse wave velocity (PWV), and aortic intima-media thickness (MAIMT) were measured. There were no differences in MAIMT (2.8 ± 1.6 mm vs. 2.4 ± 1.2 mm, P = .20) and PWV (8.9 ± 2.0 m/s vs. 8.5 ± 2.6 m/s, P = .46) between the BB and non-BB groups. The BB group had higher AI (28.7 ±11.9% vs. 22.3 ± 14.1%, P = .04), AI-75 (27.7 ± 10.7% vs. 20.1± 11.0%, P = .005), aortic SBP (140 ± 21 mm Hg vs. 125 ± 21 mm Hg, P = .01), and aortic pulse pressure (62 ± 20 mm Hg vs. 47 ± 19 mm Hg, P = .01) than the non-BB group despite similar brachial blood pressure. BB use was associated with increased aortic wave reflection despite similar degree of aortic atherosclerosis.

Keywords: Beta-blockers, atherosclerosis, arterial stiffness, augmentation index

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Conflict of interest: none.

PII: S1933-1711(07)00206-9

doi:10.1016/j.jash.2007.10.007

Journal of the American Society of Hypertension
Volume 2, Issue 2 , Pages 64-69, March 2008